- 积分
- 992
- 注册时间
- 2014-12-4
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 打卡等级:偶尔看看
- 打卡总天数:105
- 打卡总奖励:319
|
楼主 |
发表于 2018-7-20 12:00:01
|
显示全部楼层
这是一种简化。
很多时候都有妥协。
我们使用的算法允许使用小直径气缸,这是其他控制器所需要的。 较小直径的气缸,较小的阀门,泵,管道和能源成本将抵消控制器,更好的阀门和反馈装置的成本增加。
我们的客户可以使用5英寸直径的气缸和第三代控制器,但必须使用6英寸气缸和第二代控制器。 决定很简单。 使用我们的第三代控制器和先进的算法。 第二代控制器使用更传统的PID,速度和加速度前馈。
That is a simplification.
Many times there are compromises.
The algorithms we use permit using small diameter cyliders that what other controllers would require. Smaller diameter cylidners, smaller valves, pumps, plumbing and energy costs will offset the increased cost of the controller, better valve and feedback devices.
We have a customer that can use 5 inch diameter cylinders with our 3rd generation controllers but must use 6 inch cylinders with our 2nd generation controllers. The decision is simple. Use our 3rd generation controller with advanced algorithms. The 2nd generation controller used a more traditional PID with velocity and acceleration feed forward.
@back2049.
I wrote " why design a system for 0.01 mm precision when 1mm is good enough?"
Sometimes the google translator is very bad.
|
|